CASP the early years

The Camden Association of Street Properties (CASP) started off as an informal group made up of Camden council street property tenants - earliest references to casp date back to 2000.

CASP was established as a formal group when casp held its first annual general meeting (AGM) in Sept 2004 where a committee was formed to lead in representing all council street property tenants. Only one member from the informal casp group was on the committee. No reps from existing local council street property groups where on the committee.

With the help of the council, the casp committee was infiltrated and taken over by estate based tenants - who in order to qualify for casp membership where given housing transfers to council street properties.

They also teamed up with a vexatious litigant and fraudster who had transferred over from neighbouring Islington.

Since then other more local council street property groups haven't been able to set themselves up because CASP doesn't want any competition.

To establish and maintain the dominance casp wants over all other street property tenants and estate based tenants as well and to subvert democracy a range of tactics are used to intimidate and bully anyone who stands in their way.

Helped of course by facilitating council officers and members and others who seem to be easily manipulated.

It is through the district (housing) management committees (dmc's) that they build up their political 'careers'.

The dmc's started off as sub-committee's of the then Camden Council Housing Committee. They where council member lead committees that had tenant reps as co-opted members.

When the council changed to the Executive model of governance back in 2001 the dmc's should have ceased operating but the council allowed the committees to continue under the same name and with the same housing management functions lead by tenants.

Some argue that the dmc's are voting banks for the Labour council and that is why they where continued with.

I can't think of any other group of Camden residents who have been allowed to take on the council function of allocating public funds - as the dmc's do.

The dmc's also being the vehicle for which some politically ambitious types (mainly from the left) make their climb up the murky political career ladder.







The Tenant Participation Tool-kit

How tenant participation in Camden really works:
  • send 'anonymous' letters out to people claiming that another tenant rep is a paedophile
  • contact neighbours of other tenant reps/former tenant reps to stir up trouble between target and neighbours
  • make threatening phone calls such as "we're out to get you bitch"
  • claim that other tenant reps have been 'sexually inappropriate' with them
  • make malicious complaints to the police about other tenant reps/former reps
  • mis-use the disabled taxi card scheme to claim £270 per month in taxi fares
  • befriend unsuspecting tenants reps to use them for political gain
  • target wannabe cllrs for intimidation and blackmail
  • verbally abuse other tenants at public/council meetings ie scream "you need a good fcuking shag" and most bizarrely accuse former tenant reps of being responsible for the death of family member and of hating people with cancer.
  • use illnesses to gain sympathy when wrong doing is exposed
  • bully other tenant reps into doing things they don't want to do
  • make threats to other tenant reps and former tenant reps when challenged
  • spread it around that you have 'slept with' the major of the council
  • deliberately walk past other tenant reps/former tenants reps homes
  • spy on other tenant reps on the Internet via social networking sites
  • make false statements to police under penalty of perjury
  • have a few council officers and cllrs in your pocket

NB please note this is not how most tenant reps behave, but is how the most dominant, nasty and politically ambitious ones operate and have been allowed to do so by council officers and cllrs. They also align themselves with the unison "defend council housing" campaign.

Housing Management & Competition

Local Government Act 1988
"An Act to secure that local and other public authorities undertake certain activities only if they can do so competitively ....... "


The Local Government Act 1988 (Competition) (Defined Activities) (Housing Management) Order 1994
Explanatory Note

"Under Part I of the Local Government Act 1988, work falling within certain defined activities may only be carried out by defined authorities if it has previously been put out to tender in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

Article 2 of the Order, which extends to England, Wales and Scotland, amends the Act to add housing management to the existing defined activities. Articles 3 and 4 make amendments to other provisions of the Act for the purposes of the new defined activity."

The Public Contracts Regulations 2006

Public Procurement Law

Link

2nd Tenant Participation Strategy

Tenant and Leaseholder Engagement Strategy 2012-15 HERE

The councils 2nd "tenant participation" strategy - re-branded the "tenant and leaseholder engagement" strategy is about enabling council tenants to take part in the management of their homes.

This includes influencing and monitoring the services, goods and works the council as landlord provides to tenants as well as taking on landlord services themselves ie estate management boards\tenant management organisations.

Apparently, tenant involvement is a key part of housing inspections as well as to the delivery of good services.

Sounds good so far?

Well no, not for tenants like myself who where put off having anything to do with the councils so called 'strategy' simply because of the appalling behaviour of a small 'gang' of politically motivated tenants who intimidate, bully, and lie about anyone who poses any sort of threat to them whatsoever.

Prior to my involvement and experience with some committee members of a newly constituted tenants group the council had set up, I had never before been involved with any group any local authority had set up and didn't know the politics of tenant participation.

These tenants where unlike any individuals I had ever knowingly experienced before.

They are extremely manipulative.

The worse thing about it is that right from the beginning the council has supported and endorsed them, pandered to and protected them - to the detriment of other tenants well-being and safety.

The council has allowed them access to unsuspecting tenants (including vulnerable ones) knowing full well what they get up to. They have a "befriending" tactic they use to get close to people who will be of use to them.

In my view any tenant who the council encourages to participate via the dmc's or casp is in danger of falling victim to the political motivated charlatans who parade themselves as trustworthy and caring tenant advocates.

Yes, the council really does the enabling bit well.




LGO Finding of Maladministration

www.lgo.org.uk Local Government Ombudsman

London Borough of Camden (10 022 017)

Licensing Maladministration causing injustice

1 February 2012

London Borough of Camden repeatedly ignored a man’s requests for a street trading pitch and his subsequent complaints about it. The Ombudsman said the Council had no proper procedures or policies in place for allocating street trading pitches. The process lacked transparency and fairness and made the allocation of pitches open to the possibility or the appearance of corruption.

She also said the Council’s complaints procedure had failed.

The Council’s own central complaints unit appears to have been ignored by the department concerned, and my own investigation has been hampered by incorrect information provided by the Council (my emphasis). This has caused unacceptable delay and frustration to the complainant, who has been trying for three years to make use of an unused street trading pitch. Added to this, the Council has itself been losing revenue due to its own disorganisation.” (my emphasis)

The man complained about the Council’s failure to respond to his repeated requests for a particular street trading pitch that had not been used since 2008. He received no response to his first application, and his continued attempts over the next three years to secure the pitch, or another permanent pitch, were unsuccessful.

------------------------------

What to say - tip of the ice-berg - ceo's office not fit for purpose?

Ongoing problem with complaints handling so much so that when the Camden labour association got back into power at the council elections of May 2010 the Cabinet committee did away with the committee's annual (Sept usually) receiving and thus publishing of the councils annual complaints handling reports.

Like the council, the LGO only allows a certain amount of complaints to be investigated properly and which result in the publishing of a maladministration report. It doesn't help that the LGO has been infiltrated by ex-local government people with a vested interest.

The HOC Select Committee are requesting evidence for their upcoming investigation into the LGO HERE


Public Sector Equality Duty

"The Duty includes specific requirements including the need for all councils to set themselves equality objectives by 6 April 2012.The duty to publish equality objectives by 6 April 2012 means that Cabinet are required to agree the Council’s equality objectives prior to publication." http://democracy.camden.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=118&MId=3682


"The public sector equality duty consists of a general equality duty, which is set out in section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 itself, and the specific duties which came into law on the 10th September 2011 in England and 6 April in Wales (tbc in Scotland) which are imposed by secondary legislation. The general equality duty came into force on 5 April 2011.

In summary, those subject to the equality duty must, in the exercise of their functions, have due regard to the need to:

  • Eliminate unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation and other conduct prohibited by the Act.
  • Advance equality of opportunity between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not.
  • Foster good relations between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not.

The new duty covers the following eight protected characteristics: age, disability, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation. Public authorities also need to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination against someone because of their marriage or civil partnership status.

It states that compliance with the duty may involve treating some people more favourably than others" http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/advice-and-guidance/public-sector-equality-duty/introduction-to-the-equality-duty/


Housing Management Pt 2

http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/pdf/localchoicelocalcontrol.pdf

"Under Section 27AB of the 1985 Housing Act, local housing authorities must pass their responsibilities for housing management to tenant management organisations (TMOs), provided that the appropriate regulations and guidance have been followed.

The regulations issued by the Secretary of State are now the Housing (Right to Manage) (England) Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/2361). Under Regulation 18, anyone who carries out a duty under the regulations must consider any guidance the Secretary of State has issued (known as ‘statutory guidance’)"

Housing (Right to Manage) (England) Regulations 2008 HERE

-------------

Did Camden council follow the correct procedures and regulations in relation to the housing management function the five district (housing) management committees are carrying out ie allocating funds from the councils housing revenue account to the council housing estates (and estate halls) of committee members?


Tenant Participation - Value for Money?

REPORT TITLE: Tenant Participation Scrutiny Panel – Officer Response 5 Sept 2011

my emphasis added

4. VALUE FOR MONEY


4.1 As set out in the Panel report, the overall budget for the Tenant Participation team comes to £485,750. This sum is inclusive of the cost of the funding for the CFTRA (£125,154), but excludes the recharge for Democratic Services serving the five DMCs (£84,000).

4.2 Of course, these are only the direct costs of tenant participation and the Council incurs much larger costs in various forms of indirect (or mainstreamed) engagement and consultation. Examples of this will include tenant participation work by estate officers, consultation of major works schemes, officer time at DMC and TRA meetings, and statutory leasehold consultation. It is obviously difficult to accurately quantify the costs of this indirect consultation but an attempt was made for the 2006 Scrutiny review which estimated the total annual HRA costs of engagement at £2.4m.

4.3 Taking a view as to whether this expenditure represents value for money is difficult because there are no reliable benchmarks. However, the following observations can be made:

1) Any tendering process for external provided services should, by its very nature, provide some indication of value for money within the service. However, this will ultimately be dependant of the package that is tendered and the current maturity of the market for these services.

2) Within the context of the current savings programme, all services will seek to engage residents in the most cost effective manner possible. Most services concerned (e.g. Home Ownership Services, Repairs & Improvements) have already delivered significant savings against their overall budgets.

3) As part of the Council’s overall savings programme, it was agreed that direct tenant participation costs will be reduced by £100,000. So far, half of this sum has been achieved through the deletion of one post within the team and associated administrative savings. The other half of this sum has yet to be identified.

--------------------------------

I'm sure if the council put a stop to the costly 'double charging' for the administration of tenant groups money would be saved and this in turn would save tenants a lot of money in rents and charges.

Housing Management

HOUSING ACT 1985


Housing management


20 Application of housing management provisions.
(1) The following provisions of this Part [F1down to [F2section 27BA]] (general provisions on housing management matters) apply in relation to all houses held by a local housing authority for housing purposes.

(2) References in those provisions to an authority’s houses shall be construed accordingly.

21 General Management

(1) The general management, regulation and control of a local housing authority’s houses is vested in and shall be exercised by the authority and the houses shall at all times be open to inspection by the authority.

(2) Subsection (1) has effect subject to section 27 [F3(management agreements)].

23 Byelaws.
(1) A local housing authority may make byelaws for the management, use and regulation of their houses.

(2) A local housing authority may make byelaws with respect to the use of land held by them by virtue of section 12 (recreation grounds and other land provided in connection with housing), excluding land covered by buildings or included in the curtilage of a building or forming part of a highway.

(3) A local housing authority shall as respects their lodging-houses by byelaws make sufficient provision for the following purposes—
(a) for securing that the lodging-houses are under the management and control of persons appointed or employed by them for the purpose,
(b) for securing the due separation at night of men and boys above eight years old from women and girls,
(c) for preventing damage, disturbance, interruption and indecent and offensive language and behaviour and nuisances, and
(d)for determining the duties of the persons appointed by them;
and a printed copy or a sufficient abstract of the byelaws relating to lodging-houses shall be put up and at all times kept in every room in the lodging-houses.24 Rents.(1)A local housing authority may make such reasonable charges as they may determine for the tenancy or occupation of their houses.

(2) The authority shall from time to time review rents and make such changes, either of rents generally or of particular rents, as circumstances may require.


Management agreements


27 Management agreements.
(1) A local housing authority may agree that another person shall exercise in relation to—
(a) such of the authority’s houses as are specified in the agreement, and
(b) any other land so specified which is held for a related purpose,
such of the authority’s management functions as are so specified.

(2)In this Act—
(a)“management agreement” means an agreement under subsection (1) or a sub-agreement, and
(b)“manager”, in relation to a management agreement, means a person by whom management functions are exercisable under the agreement.

(3) A management agreement shall set out the terms on which the authority’s functions are exercisable by a manager.

(4) An agreement under subsection (1) shall contain such provisions as may be prescribed by regulations made by the Secretary of State.

(5) A management agreement may—
(a) include provision authorising a manager, with the consent of the authority, to agree that another person shall exercise any management function exercisable by the manager under the agreement;
(b)where a body or association is a manager, provide that the management functions of the body or association under the agreement may be performed by a committee, sub-committee, officer or employee of the body or association.

(6) Subject to subsection (7), the approval of the Secretary of State shall be required to—
(a) the making of any management agreement;
(b) the variation of a provision of a management agreement, if the provision is specified, or is of a description specified, by the Secretary of State in giving approval to the making of a management agreement.

(7) The Secretary of State may, in giving approval to the making of an agreement under subsection (1)—
(a) specify a moratorium period and the circumstances in which it is to apply;
(b)specify circumstances in which his approval is not required to the making of a sub-agreement under the agreement.

(8) If a moratorium period applies in relation to a management agreement—
(a) during the moratorium period the approval of the Secretary of State is not required to the making of a sub-agreement under the agreement;
(b) any sub-agreement made under the agreement during the moratorium period without the approval of the Secretary of State is not valid unless it is approved by the Secretary of State immediately after the end of the moratorium period.

(9) A moratorium period specified under subsection (7) must not exceed 6 months.

(10) Where a sub-agreement has been made during a moratorium period without the approval of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of State may extend the moratorium period if he is satisfied that he will not give his approval to that sub-agreement immediately after the end of that period; and this subsection may apply more than once.

(11) The approval of the Secretary of State to the making of an agreement under subsection (1) or to the variation of such an agreement may be given generally or to a particular local housing authority or description of local housing authority.

(12) The approval of the Secretary of State under this section may be given—
(a) in relation to a particular case or description of case;
(b) unconditionally or subject to conditions.

(13) Subject to subsection (15)—
(a) anything done, or not done, by a manager in connection with the exercise (or purported exercise) of a relevant function shall be treated as done, or not done, by the authority;
(b) anything done, or not done, in relation to a manager in connection with the exercise (or purported exercise) of a relevant function shall be treated as done, or not done, in relation to the authority.

(14) In subsection (13) “relevant function” means a management function of the authority exercisable by the manager under a management agreement.

(15) Subsection (13) shall not apply—
(a) to the extent that a management agreement provides otherwise as between the parties to it; or
(b) for the purposes of any criminal proceedings brought in respect of anything done or not done by the manager.

(16) References in subsection (1) to the management functions of a local housing authority in relation to houses or land—
(a) do not include such functions as may be prescribed by regulations made by the Secretary of State, but
(b) subject to that, include functions conferred by any statutory provision and the powers and duties of the authority as holder of an estate or interest in the houses or land in question.

(17) Regulations under this section—
(a) may make different provision with respect to different cases or descriptions of case, including different provision for different areas,
(b) may contain such incidental, supplementary or transitional provisions as appear to the Secretary of State to be necessary or expedient, and
(c) shall be made by statutory instrument which shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.

(18)In this section, “sub-agreement” means an agreement made by a manager and another person pursuant to a provision included in an agreement by virtue of subsection (5)(a).]


Consultation with respect to housing management


[F227BA Consultation with respect to management.
(1) The Secretary of State may make regulations for imposing requirements on a local housing authority to consult tenants, or to consider representations made to them by tenants, with respect to the exercise of their management functions (including proposals as to the exercise of those functions), in relation to any of the authority’s houses or other land held for a related purpose.


Provision of information and consultation

105 Consultation on matters of housing management.
(1) A landlord authority shall maintain such arrangements as it considers appropriate to enable those of its secure tenants who are likely to be substantially affected by a matter of housing management to which this section applies—
(a) to be informed of the authority’s proposals in respect of the matter, and
(b) to make their views known to the authority within a specified period;
and the authority shall, before making any decision on the matter, consider any representations made to it in accordance with those arrangements.

(2) For the purposes of this section, a matter is one of housing management if, in the opinion of the landlord authority, it relates to—
(a) the management, maintenance, improvement or demolition of dwelling-houses let by the authority under secure tenancies, or
(b) the provision of services or amenities in connection with such dwelling-houses;
but not so far as it relates to the rent payable under a secure tenancy or to charges for services or facilities provided by the authority.

(3) This section applies to matters of housing management which, in the opinion of the landlord authority, represent—
(a) a new programme of maintenance, improvement or demolition, or
(b) a change in the practice or policy of the authority,
and are likely substantially to affect either its secure tenants as a whole or a group of them who form a distinct social group or occupy dwelling-houses which constitute a distinct class (whether by reference to the kind of dwelling-house, or the housing estate or other larger area in which they are situated).

(4) In the case of a landlord authority which is a local housing authority, the reference in subsection (2) to the provision of services or amenities is a reference only to the provision of services or amenities by the authority acting in its capacity as landlord of the dwelling-houses concerned.

(5) A landlord authority shall publish details of the arrangements which it makes under this section, and a copy of the documents published under this subsection shall—
(a) be made available at the authority’s principal office for inspection at all reasonable hours, without charge, by members of the public, and
(b) be given, on payment of a reasonable fee, to any member of the public who asks for one.

Miscellaneous

431 Control of expenditure by housing authorities on works of conversion or improvement.
(1) A local authority or [F47development] corporation may not incur expenses in—
(a) providing dwellings by the conversion of houses or other buildings, or
(b) carrying out works required for the improvement of dwellings, with or without associated works of repair,
except in accordance with proposals submitted by the authority or corporation to the Secretary of State and for the time being approved by him.

(2)The Secretary of State’s approval may be given subject to such conditions, and may be varied in such circumstances, as appear to him to be appropriate; but before varying the terms of an approval he shall consult the authority or corporation concerned.

Toxic Soil in Camden Residential Properties

http://www.camdennewjournal.com/news/2011/oct/gardeners-told-land-still-poisoned-old-ascham-street-factory

Gardeners told land is still poisoned by old Ascham Street factory

Published: 20 October 2011
by GEORGIA GRAHAM

FAMILIES have been told that poisonous mud in their gardens – contaminated by an old Victorian factory – could be a significant health danger.

They have been warned the discovery of toxic soil means they should not eat vege­tables grown on the land and advised that children should be careful when playing outside.

Camden Council confirmed the findings in letters to residents – seven years after officials first suggested there might be a danger.

Gardens surrounding the old Ascham Street works in Kentish Town will now be paved over with homeowners footing most of the bill. Samples from 19 gardens revealed traces of carcinogenic substances leaked into the land from when the factory stood on the site in Victorian times.

Levels of lead and cadmium were so high that it was ruled they pose “significant” risk of “significant harm being caused” to human health. The other gardens, even those bordered on both sides by contaminated plots, have been given a clean bill of health.

Joan Barnett has lived in Falkland Road for 34 years and spent decades growing marrows, potatoes, cabbages and tomatoes in a garden the council has confirmed is seriously contaminated with lead. She made the heartbreaking decision to pave it over when officials initially said the land was contaminated.

Ms Barnett said: “We had to pay for every bit of work that was done on it and no one has mentioned anything about compensation.

“My husband Alan used to enjoy growing all our veg and the whole family used to eat it. The garden was like our own allotment – we had apple trees, pear trees and all sorts of outdoor vegetables, and now all we have is two greenhouses and concrete slabs. It’s no fun at all.”

She added: “I’ve brought four kids up eating food from the garden, playing out there, eating blackberries and you don’t know if they have been affected by the chemicals.”

Ms Barnett’s fears were heightened by the fate of family dog, Tramp, who finally succumbed to cancer six years ago after suffering from the disease three times.

Murray Buesst, who has lived in Leverton Road for 22 years, was told that his garden was one of the lucky uncontaminated ones.

He said: “One of our neighbours told the council that his wall was glowing in the 1970s.

It seems that the council hasn’t been bothered about the people actually living in these houses, instead they are covering their backsides over EU legislation. It has been comical, pathetic and absurd over the years.”

He added: “We have received reams of letters from Camden Council for years that say nothing.

“Instead of Soviet-style correspondence that keeps us all in the dark it would have been good if they gave us a bit of commonsense advice. One day they came and took away an apple for testing but they never bothered to tell us whether we should or should not be eating the apples from our tree.”

Joe Burke, 37, of Falkland Road, who has a thriving frog population in his garden pond, said: “We are condemned because of the lead, all of the other harmful chemicals are not at dangerous levels in my garden, and these important environments for wildlife shouldn’t be destroyed because of a bit of lead.

“We aren’t seeing three-eyed fish or anything.”

The affected houses all date from the Victorian era and have rear gardens backing onto the old Ascham Street works – a site that was host to nine different factories, including an electro-plating works, until 1986.

The New Journal reported in 2004 that the council had fears for gardens in the neighbourhood with officials planning to survey the soil.

A spokeswoman for Camden Council said: “We are sorry about the length of time taken to reach the current stage in the process of confirming the extent of contaminated land and recognise residents’ concerns.

“The number of properties identified as being contaminated has actually reduced since the last study.

“We have been working closely with a number of agencies to ensure that each resident is provided with the most accurate information possible and have now confirmed to them the outcome of extensive research carried out at each property.

However, the technical and legal requirements for assessing risks from land contamination are inevitably complex which has led to the lengthy process.

“There have also been changes in the government guidance regarding the way in which local authorities should assess risks and consequently the council had to appoint specialist consultants to assist us in the process.”

Camden Council help put with cartoon guide book

AS well as finally revealing whether Kentish Town gardens had been poisoned by dangerous chemicals, Camden Council also handed frustrated residents a series of cartoons explaining, among other things, how not to lick poisonous soil off their hands.

In a “health information” pack handed to residents the council – in conjunction with the Health Protection Agency – helpfully pointed out that “there are many chemicals all around us throughout our everyday lives”.

In case this concept was too difficult for residents to grasp the section is illustrated by pictures of “dirty hands,” “traffic fumes,” “smoking” and “dust.”

Residents are also shown how those nasty “chemicals from soils can get into our bodies” with a warning picture of a young girl licking her fingers after a messy gardening session.

The document uses cartoons to explain the complicated process of chemicals making their way into the soil, from the soil on to human hands or into vegetables, and from there into the human body.


Reform of Housing Revenue Account - the Landlord Account

http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk Link

Reform of the Housing Revenue Account Subsidy System

From April 2012, the system of local authority housing finance (known as the housing revenue account, or HRA) will undergo the most significant and far reaching change since the war, and will be devolved to local authorities to manage themselves. Authorities which own housing stock will gain full control of their housing income and expenditure and be able to make their own decisions on how and in what way they invest in tenants' homes. If they wish, they will even be able to build new homes using surplus rental income.

The reform of the HRA has been a long process. The previous Labour Government consulted on HRA devolution and moved towards it, but did not implement it. The Coalition Government confirmed in February 2011 that it was going ahead with HRA devolution from April 2012, a move for which there was broad cross-party and sector support.

In return for being able to manage their own HRAs, the 171 stock-owning local authorities have been allocated a share of the national housing debt, totalling some £28bn. London's boroughs have fared relatively well in this settlement, being allocated £5.5bn of debt, some 25% less than estimated was originally owed.

In addition, local authorities have had a ceiling placed on their ability to borrow against the rental income that they will now receive in full. This is because local authority borrowing counts as part of the Public Sector Borrowing Requirement (PSBR) and thus counts as part of the national debt, which the Government is keen to reduce.

--------------------------

Chapter 3 of The Localism Act 2011 HERE, abolishes the Housing Revenue Account Subsidy system. This takes affect from April 2012.

According to a recent council report HERE (11. Debt Management) Camden Councils share of the settlement debt will be £518m. This is bad news for tenants who through above inflation rent and service charge increases will have to foot the bill. The council recently set the increase of rents from April 2012 at 8%.

In time council housing rents are expected to come into line with housing association rents.

Revenue funds can be spent on capital expenditure.

The reason for the new system is due to the "Daylight Robbery Campaign" - lobbying by some unions , council tenant reps, MP's and clrs, under the "defend council housing" banner who object to the socialist way of distribution as the rents from better of tenants not in receipt of housing benefit have been used (distributed) across the country to give financial help to poorer tenants via housing benefit. Ref HOC Research Paper HERE.

Contrary to popular myth, housing benefit (rent rebate) does not in all cases cover the full cost of rent or service charges so that when rents and services charges are increased the cost is incurred by the tenant.


Hanging Death on Council Estate

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk

Swiss Cottage basketball hoop hanging death

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

A man was found hanged from the frame of a basketball hoop at a Swiss Cottage sports court on this morning (Wednesday, January 11.

The man, believed to be in his 30s, was discovered shortly before 6.30am in Dobson Close estate, off Hilgrove Road, by a woman walking her dog.

The body, which has not been identified, was hanging yards from a children’s playground.

Police said they requested a tent to shield the body from children.

Clearly shaken up, Natasha Ullah, 29, who discovered the body, said: “I was walking the dog this morning, I went through the park and I noticed a guy hanging on the pitch.

“All I remember is seeing the guy hanging there. I was quite shocked at that.

“I rang up to call the police. I didn’t really want to get any nearer to him.”

There was no sign of how the man climbed the 10 feet to the top of the hoop.

Residents of the estate said they were shocked and saddened at the death.

Muna Salaad, 34, of Hillgrave Estate, who saw the body covered in a white cloth, said: “I feel sad. It was a bit weird when I saw it. It took me a few seconds, I thought ‘Oh God there’s a body there’. It’s really sad.”

Pensioner Norma Boyle, whose flat in Farjeon House, Dobson Close, overlooks the basketball court, said: “It is dreadful. We’ve never had anything like this before. We have lived here for 51 years and never known anything like it.”

Police sealed off the area for several hours, but are not treating the death as suspicious.

The area was reopened shortly before 11am the same morning.

An inquest will be opened and adjourned at St Pancras Coroners’ Court.

The State of Tenant Participation

Back in 2009 David Padfield the councils present assistant director of housing management at a public meeting, named a council tenant as being "dealt with by the courts".

The tenant had been to court and was found guilty and fined for 'harassment' of other council tenants. Word about the summary conviction spread fast around the council. Chuckles all round?

The judge who was supposed to hear the case was swapped for another judge who had a reputation for being harsh.

Around the same time the boroughs leading council tenants group the Camden Federation of Tenants and Residents Associations (CFTRA), who have since around 2003 been funded by the council to provide tenants with a service and allegedly a 'voice', had also had experiences with the courts and been "dealt with".

Oddly this wasn't mentioned at any public meetings by the AD of housing management or any of his underlings.

It was deliberately kept quiet (covered-up). Shock horror.

Two of the cftra directors where Camden labour party members who wanted onto the council.

One had already had his chances of getting onto the council in 2006 sabotaged by antagonistic tenants who have 'form' when it comes to such things. They weren't fussy about who they targeted be they Labour, Fib-dem or Tory party members. Other residents where also targeted for the 'treatment'.

One of their tactics is to contact the police and make allegations against a particular person or person/s. This results in the target being contacted by the police either at home or by email. As with one such contact the person/s weren't even informed that an offence had been committed - but they where being watched.

Do they tell the police they work for the council?

Just how did they get Camden police to go around to an elderly disabled persons home and intimidate him into being quiet? A most shameful episode in the history of policing in Camden via the corruption that emanates from the boroughs council. People in the council including elected council members did nothing about it. One council member who really should have known better was passing information onto the 'gang'.

The gang have a tactic of befriending people who will be useful to them - the council knows about this and even encourages it.

What sort of council do we have in Camden that encourages this sort of nasty anti-social behaviour?

A public authority/municipal corporation that lacks integrity is my guessing.


Council Scrutiny Committees

Not all members of the councils various 'scrutiny' committees are elected council members.

Some go onto 'greater' things - others have no where else to go after their stint is over.

The Housing and Adult Social Care (HASC) scrutiny committee seems biased toward council tenant problems.

There is a theory that one can get onto a council committee by using bullying, intimidation and manipulation.

Appointed committee members don't appear to have to follow any Code of Conduct.

According to the councils website "Three of the scrutiny committees mirror the three service directorates, one covers health scrutiny and the fifth will look at corporate resources, performance and policy together with covering the central departments.
  • Children schools and families
  • Culture and environment
  • Housing and adult social care
  • Health
  • Resources and corporate performance"
As previously reported on this blog, (link to post to follow when I can be arsed) the HASC committee breached the Councils Constitution by setting up various sub-committees. I think it was one of the committee chairs who claimed that the part of the constitution that 'forbid' the setting up of sub-groups wasn't binding.

Anyway, since the breach the councils Constitution has been altered (Nov 2011) to accommodate the hasc scrutiny committee.

NB Councils are permitted by statute to have scrutiny committee sub-panels, but it isn't against the 'law' to not have them.

Lots of odd things going on with the hasc committee since the Camden labour association got back into power in May 2010.

The councils Annual Complaints Handling report (usually given to the Cabinet committee in Sept) has also ceased being published on the councils website as like previous years. In the new era of greater public authority transparency and accountability and so-called 'devolved' power to local communities, this can only be seen as a backward step.

Council Mobile Phone Charges

Since August 2010 Camden Council has published on its website HERE some of its monthly spending data.

A large amount of public money has been spent on mobile phone charges.

In the period 16 month period since Aug 2010 - Nov 2011 £1,145,088. 44 has been spent.

That's 1 million, 145 thousand, 88 pounds and 44 pence.

Money well spent?

New Director of HASC?

No word yet from the council of who has been been chosen to be the new housing and adult social care department chief director. Its been a few months now since the present hasc director Mike Cooke was elevated to the top post of chief executive officer following the present ceo's decision to quit the council. Mike Cooke hadn't been in the post of hasc director for long before being chosen as ceo.

The council must have made a decision by now and are keeping it secret.

If its who I think it is there may be a case for a judicial review.

Wonders on what basis one gets promoted in the council?

Anthony Hardy

Anthony Hardy lived in council housing in the borough of Camden until early 2002 when he was arrested, detained and later charged with the murder of two women. He was also a mental health service user who was at the time of the murders receiving care from Camden council social services and 'care' from Camden councils housing directorate.

You know where this is going?

The Independent Review into the Care and Treatment of Mr Anthony Hardy - September 2005

  • 10 years on - has there been a positive change in the councils housing department behaviour? Not following procedures, ignoring legal advice, trying to hound a tenant out of his only and not posh by any means council home?

Why the councils tenancy management functions haven't been out-sourced to the private sector yet is a mystery. .

Tenancy Sucessions and Council Bullying

A council tenant over in West Hampstead is having problems with a rogue housing estate officer attached to the local office.

The tenant is a relative of an elderly woman who held the tenancy for many years. The relative moved into the elderly woman's home to be her live in carer and was so for at least 3 years before she sadly died last year.

Since then he has been hounded by a bullying housing officer to get out of the flat even though he is lawfully entitled to be there.

Allegedly the housing officer wants the property for a mate of his as it has three bedrooms.

The housing officer allegedly sent someone around to the property to have a look at it despite the tenant still living there.

The tenant has been threatened twice with court action to get him evicted.

Instead of talking to this tenant in a civil manner and giving him enough points to be able to move to a suitable smaller property, the landlord has resorted to type with bully boy tactics designed to cause the tenant stress and upset.



Housing Support Group

A list of all services that are provided under the Housing Support banner.

The Housing Support Group is a group of smaller teams in the housing management division of the Housing and Adult Social Care Directorate. They are:
  • Tenancy support team - TST is a team of support workers offering support to tenants and residents whose homes may be at risk due to mental health problems. The TST is managed by the Housing support services co-ordinator who also aims to improve links between housing services and support services within and outside the Council.
  • Performance support team – this includes: The housing investigations team which carries out tenancy checks, carries out checks to makes sure requests to take over tenancies meet the necessary criteria and investigates unauthorised occupancy and housing fraud. They also help the Council gain access to homes to carry out safety checks
  • The former tenants accounts team deal with financial matters relating to former tenants, for example if tenants move out leaving rent arrears outstanding the FTA team will try to locate them to ensure the debt is paid.
  • The court officers attend court for the Council and prepare court cases. They usually deal with rent arrears possession cases, .
  • Rent service team – this team are responsible for rent arrears collection for all Council tenancies.
  • Service development team – the team help the management team try to ensure the Council continues to improve services. It looks at what other landlords do and new legislation and government guidance. It helps design staff guidance and training and carries out project work for the housing management division.
The team also supports and monitors the six local tenant management organisations and helps tenants who want to develop new local management agreements.
  • Tenant participation team – this team encourages and promotes tenant participation and provides support for tenant representatives and staff who have tenant participation activities as part of their role.
  • Welfare rights team – this is a team of welfare rights advisors and a financial advisor. They provide advice about welfare benefits and debt.
There are currently 70 staff in the Housing Support Group, including team managers, at a total cost of £2,486,834.

....... a formal assessment of the Groups performance as a whole has not been undertaken.

The annual budget for the Housing Support Group for the years 2008/9, 2009/10, 2010/11 and 2011/12.
2008/09 £2,871,240
2009/10 £5,223.740
2010/11 £6,264,755
2011/12 £4,096,244

The group is funded by the Housing Revenue Account with the exception of the Tenancy Support Team that is funded by Mental Health Commissioning using the General Fund.

The client group the funding is aimed at and the criteria for eligibility:
The criteria are self explanatory relating to the titles of each individual team, with the exception of the Tenancy support team which is health related.

Between 2009 and 2011, the Customer Services provision for all five District Housing Offices was included in the group, and the Rent service team together with the Former tenants accounts team joined the group in 2010.

The reason for Camden Council not carrying out assessments of this service:
...... because the council has no formal review mechanism for team performance at this level.
(Ref FoI request)
----------------------------------------

http://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/content/housing/general-housing-information/supporting-people/supporting-people.en

Supporting people

The supporting people programme, which provides housing-related support services to vulnerable people in Camden, is no longer delivered by a single team.

Housing related support services

  • services for young people (the ‘young people’s pathway’) are commissioned within children schools and families
  • services for older people, people with mental health problems, and people with learning and/or physical disabilities are commissioned within the strategic planning and joint commissioning division of housing and adult social care
  • services for single homeless people with support needs, homeless families, people with substance misuse problems, rough sleepers, ex-offenders and women escaping domestic violence (hostel pathways services) are commissioned within the needs and resources division of housing and adult social care

Local Government Transparency

http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/transparency/transparencyguidance/

12. As a minimum, the public data that should be released are:

• Expenditure over £500, (including costs, supplier and transaction information). Any sole trader or body acting in a business capacity in receipt of payments of at least £500 of public money should expect such payments to be transparent.

• Senior employee salaries, names (with the option for individuals to refuse to consent for their name to be published), job descriptions, responsibilities, budgets and numbers of staff. ‘Senior employee salaries’ is defined as all salaries which are above £58,200 and above (irrespective of post), which is the Senior Civil Service minimum pay band. Budgets should include the overall salary cost of staff reporting to each senior employee.

• An organisational chart of the staff structure of the local authority including salary bands and details of currently vacant posts.

• The ‘pay multiple’ – the ratio between the highest paid salary and the median average salary of the whole of the authority’s workforce.

• Councillor allowances and expenses.

• Copies of contracts and tenders to businesses and to the voluntary community and social enterprise sector.

• Grants to the voluntary community and social enterprise sector should be clearly itemised and listed.

• Policies, performance, external audits and key inspections and key indicators on the authorities’ fiscal and financial position.

• The location of public land and building assets and key attribute information that is normally recorded on asset registers and

• Data of democratic running of the local authority including the constitution, election results, committee minutes, decision - making processes and records of decisions.

Mental Health in Camden

According to the 2010-11 Annual Report of the Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust HERE, (my emphasis in bold)

" The incidence of mental ill health is much higher in London and Camden scores highly on the Mental Illness Needs Index.

Mental health need is closely correlated to deprivation , and Camden has high rates of deprivation in wards in the south and middle of the Borough.

Camden has high rates of mental illness associated with homelessness and transience. The three major rail terminals, and two large A&E departments, also attract people into Camden.

Camden has one of the highest rates of registered drug users in the Capital, with two major drug markets.

The Psychiatric Morbidity Survey estimated the prevalence of common mental health disorders in those aged 16 to 74 to be 182 per 1000 population for London. This equates to 37,000 adults in Camden.

In excess of 1400 Camden residents aged 65+ are estimated to suffer from dementia

According to the Mental Health Needs Index (MINI), Camden has one of the highest needs for mental health services in the country (109% above the England average). These figures are changing as demographics change, though Camden remains an area of high mental health need.

The mortality rate for suicide and injury of undetermined intent is 14.4 deaths per 100.000 population, almost twice the London average of 7.9 deaths, and the national average of 8.3 deaths.

The rate for women is almost three times the national average
(11.3 compared to 4.2 deaths)2"

Deprivation Index Here


What isn't clear from the above report is the tenure of service users - I think it would be interesting to know whether housing tenure has any baring on incidents of mental illness.

The NHS Foundation Trust is working in partnership with Camden council to provide mental health services to Islington and Camden adult residents and given that the housing part of the council directorate responsible (housing and adult social care) doesn't have a good track record on how they manage mental health of tenants, and some could argue the housing directorate (tenant participation and landlord management) and certain ambitious political fractions add to the incidents of adult mental ill-health in the borough.

In my experience and that of others, 'tenant participation' via the District (housing) Management Committee's (DMC's) , the Camden Association of Street Properties (CASP) and the Camden Federation of Tenants and Residents Associations (CFTRA) isn't for faint the hearted.

Because of the harmful and vindictive behaviour (and nature) of certain council tenants, council members and council officers, it is fraught with dangers. This cabal of players whose main aim in life seems to be 'fcuking over' as many people as possible - manipulation, lying and intimidation is the name of their game has given much weight to tenant participation in Camden having a much deserved bad reputation. Nothing changes for the better because the main players are never held to account for their actions, not by the council not by the police. The political will just isn't there.

This type of environment is not healthy - well-being is not promoted. The mindset to change just isn't there and this cannot be a good thing.


Housing Support Services

National Housing Federation and Sitra Briefing


Supporting People and the future of housing related support


Introduction and update


In April 2009, the ring fence around Supporting People funding was removed. The £1.66bn will continue to be paid as a named grant in 2009-10 but will not be protected. All local authorities will have the freedom to spend the money how they see fit locally.

Supporting People has helped some of the most vulnerable and socially excluded people in society who do not qualify for statutory care. The removal of the Supporting People ring fence creates a significant risk that vital services for vulnerable people will suffer as funding is diverted away to other priorities and the experience, expertise and focus of Supporting People will be lost.

However, the new funding regime also creates opportunities to respond to local needs in more flexible ways, by joining up expenditure across health, adult social care and housing related support. This will mean new or expanded partnerships with different local authority service areas. As we move through the transition to new funding arrangements there is a need to prepare for opportunities and preserve and build on the successes of Supporting People.

Continue reading HERE
---------------------------

Camden Councils website about Supporting People HERE

Types of services provided by Leeds Council HERE



I have Dementia?

Apparently I have dementia and it came as quite a shock to me when I first heard the news as I had no idea.

Surely there is some mistake in the medically qualified diagnosis?

I'm not that old, well not past 50 anyway.

Wait.

I may have to contact my GP to make an appointment with a medically qualified physician for a second opinion.

I am very upset.

I found out about 'my' medical condition from a member of the public, who had phoned up the town hall to make enquires about a voluntary group (who have been receiving public money for years to allegedly provide a service) and was (much to his surprise) informed by two council employees that I have this medical condition.

I'm upset as anyone would be, to learn that I apparently have (because not 1 but 2 council employees said so so it must be true), such a serious illness.

Hang on.

Why are council staff giving out this information to members of the public - when even I didn't know I had the condition?

Does this mean I'm demented?

Surely now I have this condition I will need extra care and understanding from me lords and lordesses up at da big house?

-----------

Apparently I have also made threats of physical violence to un-named council members and used violence against a committee member of a public funded voluntary group.

If this was actually true it could I suppose be explained away by me having a serious cognitive/mental illness such as the one I have recently been made aware of that I apparently have. I'm sure the police would have arrested and charged me by now or i'd be in a care home due to my newly diagnosed mental condition?

Just how low can they go?

Whats odd about dementia in Camden residents is that it seems in many cases to only appear (along with the apparent violent tendencies) when the conduct of council officers or their little helpers comes under the spotlight. Weird or what?


SOLD: Prime Council Housing in NW3

The Labour run council have sold off two prime location council street properties in NW3, through estate agents Knight Frank HERE.

Council officer report to Cabinet committee meeting 7 Sept 2011 HERE

Theo Blackwell (cabinet member in charge of finance) who seems to have taken responsible for the sell offs, (as opposed to the cabinet member for housing) claims £11m has been offered for the two properties. The money will part go towards upgrading council homes in his ward (Gospel Oak). webcast of meeting HERE, index point 14.

Perhaps if the council as landlord didn't waste so much money on 'incidental' housing/landlord 'services' and freebies there wouldn't be a need to sell off such prime and no doubt sought after properties.

NB apparently the decision to sell the properties was made in Dec 2009 at the then called executive (now called cabinet) committee meeting when the lib-dems/tories had control of the council. Officers report HERE

No minutes of the Dec 2009 executive meeting are up on the councils website.

Annual Governance Statement

REPORT OF: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE

FOR SUBMISSION TO: AUDIT COMMITTEE

14 SEPTEMBER 2011

Members are asked to approve the report.

Annual Governance Statement (AGS)

1. Scope of Responsibility
The London Borough of Camden is responsible for ensuring that:
 its business is conducted in accordance with the law and proper standards;

 public money is safeguarded and properly accounted for; and

 public money is used economically, efficiently and effectively.

The London Borough of Camden also has a duty under the Local Government Act 1999 to make arrangements to secure continuous improvement in the way in which its functions are exercised, having regard to a combination of economy, efficiency and effectiveness.

CASP getting to big for their boots?

Reading the recently put up on the councils website, minutes of a Camden Association of Street Properties (casp) committee meeting that was held in May & June 2011, I couldn't help but think "who do CASP think they are"?

According to the minutes a 'CASP cam' has been put up in Harrington square in Camden Town to 'combat' anti-social behaviour. CASP CAM? i've heard it all now. What next a 'casp cam' on every corner spying on people?

CASP seem to be trying to work their way into every area of council street property tenants (and everyone else it seems) lifes, from plots of land to redevelop as gardens, to spy cameras. CASP even 'involved' themselves (allegedly) in trying to 'secure' funding for a community festival in Swiss cottage.

Casp seems to be acting like a district management committee, or even the council. Delusions of grandeur?

What concerns me about the 'casp cam' is why a tenants group has done this and not the police or council who receive public money to 'combat' ASB? Aren't the council or the police doing their jobs properly? Are there even any signs posted to warn people that they are being watched and caught on 'casp cam'. What about data protection?

Casp claiming in their minutes that they are "seen as democratic" is a bit mystifying - seen by whom? What evidence is there to back up this claim?

No evidence as far as I can tell as to how many registered members casp has, no publicising of when casp committee meetings are being held and a committee that appoints one another back onto the committee at AGM's.

No evidence of attendance numbers at casp general or alleged area meetings - thats democratic is it?

CASP isn't even a legally recognised group ie it isn't incorporated and isn't regulated, yet the council funds and endorses, and allows casp to gain access to vulnerable residents knowing of casps history. From mine and other peoples experience, CASP cannot be trusted with access to anyone let alone vulnerable residents.

UPDATE
A recent Camden Town DMC report states that CASP put in a bid for a CCTV camera monitor costing wait for it .............. £10,000 ......... but was refused because casp hadn't attended this dmc's meetings.

£10,000 for a monitor? I dread to think how much the 'casp cam' cost. Ow look found a website that sells cctv monitors for £114.54 HERE.


Stop funding SOLACE says Housing Minister

Localgov.co.uk

25 August 2011

Shapps calls on councils to cease funding SOLACE

Jonathan Werran

Housing minister Grant Shapps has urged councils to cease funding the Society of Local Authority Chief Executive and Senior Managers (SOLACE), accusing the representative body and its commerical arms of promoting ever-higher senior salaries.

SOLACE Enterprises, which operates as a 'not for profit' public sector company helping councils make senior level appointments and fill interim management roles, is currently overhauling its business plan. Former SOLACE general director David Clark, who has been seconded from the society, leads the refresh.

In a statement issued last night, however, Mr Shapps said: 'I fail to see the business case for the public funding a body that has acted as a broker for local authority chief executives helping to bump up their pay as they move from council to council.

'There is an urgent need to rein in excessive chief exec pay packets and exercise some restraint, which is why I am calling on all public bodies to cease funding SOLACE.'

Responding to criticisms made earlier in the week, chair of SOLACE Enterprises Rich Benton said criticisms of the organisation's role in the recruitment of local government chief executives were inaccurate and misleading.

He stated the body provides independent advice on the appointment process and that no serving chief executive is involved in decisions on appointments or setting salaries.

The former Mouchel chair and Capita Sales director, who replaced Sir Michael Pitt last year added: 'We play no role in setting salary levels merely advise on market forces based on available data. Salaries are set by the Elected Members of the Council representing the public so the people who pay their salaries do in fact have a say in the process.'

------------------------------------

SOLACE Society Of Local Authority Chief Executives.

ALACE Association of Local Authority Chief Executives.