Friday 25 Oct 2025
I was coming back from doing some grocery shopping and had just gotten off the bus and started to walk through the small housing estate nearby to where my flat is and as usual i turned my phone camera on in case something happened i needed to have on record - and i notice white van very near to where i live and as i got closer i notice that its ro64 so continuing recording and he moved the van - [he was literally in the same place with van the week before going into flat c, when i was coming through the flats from shopping - a co-incidence? hmm or something else. ]and got out just as i was trying to get into the house where i live and he said something and came closer to me [approached me, i didnt approach him] and started filming me. next ph comes out and she shouting wrongly claiming im approaching her - when i wasn't [all the while im still filming] flat c still shouting ..approaching me, and im saying im not you are approaching me, even ro64 tried to get her to move back from me.
shes giving it the mouth, so the neighbours can hear and as usual 'she who shouts loud enough for others to hear' is so telling the truth? nope as usually shes sprouting off bs to make me look bad etc etc.
she threatened to call police again. i phoned them and was told they wouldnt be coming down but a cad number was sent.
not long after 2 male met police turns up at my door and im being arrested again - for breaching a anti harassment order from the courts - to not approach a r064, anyone attached to flat c and that his name was XX - that name sounds familiar i thought. i tell the coppers no its not called what you said, it doesn't say what you said, it doesnt even mention that name. copper says he had just seen a recording of me appraoching her.
no i didnt i says she approached me and i said i filmed it and tried to show them the footage but they didnt want to know. they where there to arrest me and cart me off it seems and nothing i could say etc was going to change that] turns out they had to hang around in my flat for longer that usual as their wasn't a police van available as yet.... anyway
after hours of being traumatised again, my anxiety level going sky high, thinking they where going to kill me etc etc etc and a number of lies from various custody police, one of them that they had to keep me in police custody until i was brought to court sat morning - so from about 5 or so pm friday eve i had to against my will again, stay in police custody. the custody sargeant/s [2 of them i was told when asked] the female was lovely [considering the situation] and was doing the 'booking me in' on the computer whilst the 2 'foot soldier's who brought me in stood either side of me at the counter, one moving about very impatiently. anyway they eventally went and blah blah ..... the usual ....... and hrs later me asking to speak to whoever is in charge at the station as i wanted to try and make sense of why i was there .... evently i was allowed out to go speak to male custody sarg who was sitting behind the counter at computer.
and im thinking his hair is quite striking. next thing someone came to cell whilst im in it opened the hatch thing produces a handheld dictation machine and says 'im arresting you, blah blah 2009 ... blah blah. huh i thought what the fuck is going on. it was the custody sargent who had let his hair down [literally]
seems that the arresting copper [or someone else] lifted the name from 2009 and applied it to ro64...
earlier when speaking at the custody desk with male sarg hes saying its all on the computer - that he was looking at but i didnt see.how can it be.... they are stitching me up and so blatantly.
turns out after that shift had finished and the new shift came on, i was released without charge but on bail [on bail? wft this needs sortin out]
it was a mistake. a mistake? though i don't know his name etc i think he was sargent, he apoliged for what had happened and couldnt have been nice enough .... mental health person and appropriate adult person was there and we chatted a while - they couldnt have been nicer either.
looked like what had happened was [i will find out for sure later] that flat c or ro64 or both had phoned up
the police, and 2 males where dispatched to go get me. i think someone else was contacted as well but i don't know for sure yet.
what they had done was take something that was on the police data base from years ago and attached it to flat c and ro64 including a restraining order.
a 'mistake' they claim. and im wondering who came up with that one?
so thats false arrest, false detention and again traumating me, etc etc. well done.
------------------------
what i know from having [non-aggrivatve] arguments with a few police officers is that they do not know the law as well as they may think they do. i know a little, and i knew enough to know that they are not immune from being prosecuted/sued for their bad actions, as one officer claimed to be .... not true i says, and he back tracked on that one.
i think in most cases they know they are acting illegally etc [exceeding their lawful/legal] authority but they do it anyway - maybe thinking they will get away with it or maybe they really don't care if they do get pulled up and lose their job, sent to prison etc or are delusional.
they have way too much legal authority to arrest, detain etc etc people than many coppers can professional handle, they mis-use/ abuse these powers and to the detriment of others, many who imo do not deserve to be treated the way they have been by the police.
There is also the processes that say from arrest, they 'have to' follow which could be changed, they are not written in stone, they are not the ten commands sort of thing. its the same with the courts and some of the actual laws, common or legislation some that do not imo make sense, and are unfair. and bad law making or implementation has victims and victors and some really do not deserve it. imo. i very much believe in deserving and underserving.
end note
another procedural issue to do with the courts is that of the serving of court summons or requisitions and how in the case of ones that are send out by post, which as far as i am aware are deemed to have been served if a few steps are taken] even if the person who the summons was sent to, doesnt receive the document.
and no checks or anything are necessary for when if an arrest warrant is issued, for the police or whoever to actual check before arresting someone.... and when they do to actually follow what the order says and not make up the law [ to suit themselves or others] and exceed their powers [again]. this is something i have experienced.
so many procedural things i think need tiding up within how the police operate to do with processes
they 'have to go through' and some when 'mistakes' happen right from the start, they can be sorted and do not need to go through the whole distressing etc thing of detention etc etc until court hearing.
this is done at unnecessarily at times to frustrate/distress and punish the person.
lastly, the police and implementing Reasonable Adjustments under the Equality Act 2010 [s20 duty to make adjustments here ] and other Human Rights are not taken seriously - i have had to keep repeating myself and say 'where are my human rights' where are the 'reaonable adjustments' i am legally entitled to as a disabled, vulnerable person - where are they, i want them, [does that sound demanding? considering the situation and unjust processes etc and being traumatised and feeling like im being tortured, i think me 'demanding' my rights occasional and i don't usually make demands' is justified.
