About this blog

Ramblings, thoughts, facts and opinions about political things - starting point council tenant participation with my land-lord Camden council and council tenant reps plus other housing issues, and whatever.


NOTE: I believe this account has been illegally hacked. Little clues have been left for me. They like playing games.

Sunday, 13 June 2021

London Building Acts: byelaws

When the council property I live in was converted (in the late 1970's) from a single house into 3 separate flats, building regulations in London where the responsibility of the local council in the form of Byelaws [Local Acts]

Statutory Instruments [secondary legislation] such as the Building Regulations 1976 HERE, did not apply to London as elsewhere in the country until the Building Act 1984. 

Some information about Local Acts HERE

HoL 1999 Housing, Quiet Enjoyment, Nuisance HERE 

"But they did not contravene the bye-laws in force at the time"


The Building Act 1984 replaced the previous system of local bye-laws with nationally applicable regulations made by the Secretary of State for the Environment.

The Building Regulations 1985 (SI 1985/1065) contained for the first time a requirement that walls and floors which separate one dwelling from another should resist the transmission of airborne and impact sound: see Part E of Schedule 1 to the Regulations.

Similar provisions are now contained in the Building Regulations 1991 (SI 1991/2768). But the regulations apply only to buildings erected or converted after they came into force."


" Byelaws are local laws made by a local council under an enabling power contained in a public general act or a local act requiring something to be done – or not done – in a specified area. They are accompanied by some sanction or penalty for their non-observance."

If validly made, byelaws have the force of law within the areas to which they apply. Generally byelaws are overseen by the relevant government department or confirming authority who has policy responsibility for the subject matter." HERE 



The Local Government Act 1972 HERE gives instructions about the making of local government bye laws [also called Local Acts]

Part XI [11]  General Provisions as to Local Authorities HERE, under the cross heading Byelaws are sections 235-238 HERE 

Sections 262 Local Acts and instruments HERE 

Going back in time 40 years or so, the London Building Act 1930 HERE came about 12 years after the end of world war 1 [1914-18] 


The whole Act came into force 1 October 1930.

        Part VI [6] Construction of Buildings sections 57 - 88

London Building Acts [Amendment] Act 1939 HERE

London County Council [General Powers] Act 1948 HERE 

Local Government Act 1972 HERE

Greater London Council [General Powers] Act 1974 HERE

Building Control Act 1966 HERE

Housing and Building Control Act 1984 HERE 
Building Act 1984 HERE



March 2018
  https://assets.grenfelltowerinquiry.org.uk/documents/Colin%20Todd%20report.pdf   

 2.17 approval under the London Building Acts and the associated bye laws was the responsibility of the Greater London Council [GLC]. 


4.1.13 The London Building Acts 1930 - 1939 gave powers for secondary legislation to be produced in the form the London Building [Constructional] Bye laws. The BLs would have comprised:


The Public Health Act 1936 HERE
section 61

Statutory Instrument 1057  HERE
1972 No 317
BUILDING AND BUILDINGS

The Building Regulations 1972




 The below Act exempted some buildings from building by-laws.

Public Health Act 1936 HERE


NB I have tried to track down the relevant local London by-laws that where supposed to be in place but no-one seems to have them: locally, [London] county hall [Mayor of London ] national archives. 

Housing Priority for Infamous Gangster

"All of which begs a question: how exactly did Britain’s most infamous gangster end up being granted his plum tenancy?"

"Camden Council this week refused to comment, insisting that its housing system ‘prioritises people in accordance with legislation’." 


 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6684753/How-gangland-boss-Terry-Adams-amassed-fortune-one-Britains-feared-gangsters.html

8 February 2019 









Sunday, 6 June 2021

£6m Overspend by Housing Department - 2010

http://curnockstreetestate.com/2012/03/22/6m-overspend-by-housing-department/

22 March 2012 







Hanging Death on Council Estate - 2012

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk


Swiss Cottage basketball hoop hanging death

Wednesday, January 11, 2012
A man was found hanged from the frame of a basketball hoop at a Swiss Cottage sports court on this morning (Wednesday, January 11).

The man, believed to be in his 30s, was discovered shortly before 6.30am in Dobson Close estate, off Hilgrove Road, by a woman walking her dog. The body, which has not been identified, was hanging yards from a children’s playground.

Police said they requested a tent to shield the body from children.

Clearly shaken up, Natasha Ullah, 29, who discovered the body, said: “I was walking the dog this morning, I went through the park and I noticed a guy hanging on the pitch. “All I remember is seeing the guy hanging there. I was quite shocked at that. “I rang up to call the police. I didn’t really want to get any nearer to him.”

There was no sign of how the man climbed the 10 feet to the top of the hoop.
Residents of the estate said they were shocked and saddened at the death.

Muna Salaad, 34, of Hillgrave Estate, who saw the body covered in a white cloth, said: “I feel sad. It was a bit weird when I saw it. It took me a few seconds, I thought ‘Oh God there’s a body there’. It’s really sad.”

Pensioner Norma Boyle, whose flat in Farjeon House, Dobson Close, overlooks the basketball court, said: “It is dreadful. We’ve never had anything like this before. We have lived here for 51 years and never known anything like it.”

Police sealed off the area for several hours, but are not treating the death as suspicious.

The area was reopened shortly before 11am the same morning.
An inquest will be opened and adjourned at St Pancras Coroners’ Court.

Wednesday, 2 June 2021

Council fined £40,000 over death - 2009

http://www.thecnj.co.uk/camden/2009/032609/news032609_02.html Camden News - by RICHARD OSLEY Published: 26 March 2009

Barney’s death: council fined £40k at Old Bailey

‘No amount of money can represent the value of life’ – Judge

AFTER two and half years which have seen a police investigation, an inquiry by safety inspectors, a coroner’s inquest, and an appearance at Britain’s most famous criminal court, Camden Council has been ordered to pay a £40,000 fine over failings connected to the death of a scaffolder electrocuted on one of its estates. 

 The Town Hall was sentenced over a breach in health and safety legislation at the Old Bailey on Monday, admitting that it had failed to make proper checks on a defective lamp which was so faulty it had become a deathtrap. 

 Father-of-three Ralph Kennedy, 24 – better known by his boyhood nickname Barney – died almost instantly when he touched the lamp on the Mayford estate in Somers Town in September 2006. 

 The case was brought by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), which investigated his death. Judge 

Richard Hone QC said deciding on the size of the fine was a “difficult task” but warned the technicalities of the breach had to be considered ahead of emotions. 

 The judge received victim statements from Mr Kennedy’s father – also called Ralph – and his girlfriend, Kelly Ivory, the mother of two of his children and with whom he shared a flat in Camden Town. Judge Hone QC said: “The impact statements are very moderate. The father of the deceased acknowledges that what is important is that there is no repetition of the failings in this case.” He added: 

“No amount of money can possibly represent the value of life.” Camden, which pleaded guilty to the breach, was ordered to pay £16,000 in legal costs in addition to the fine. Housing department director Michael Scorer was in court to hear the penalty and his appearance and public apology was praised by the judge. Camden has reviewed all of its light fittings in the wake of the case and spent more than £2million on inspections and improvements. But it is not the end of the case as Camden must still resolve compensation claims from Mr Kennedy’s loved ones. 

 The Old Bailey’s court number eight heard how the council did not have full records of work done to the lamp and could not say why the brown safety earth wire inside was cut. Other lights in the series of external wall lamps – only reachable by ladders and scaffolding – were also found to be faulty. Valerie Charbit, prosecuting, said: 

“There was no evidence of five-year tests as recommended by British Standard and Wiring regulations.” The earth wire, if intact, would normally remove the danger of electrocution by diverting the hazard to a fuse. Inspections showed a clear cut rather than a worn out wire, but a coroner’s inquest failed to establish why or when it had been snipped. “It has been said that it might have been done to stop the light flickering – that is the speculation,” said John Williams, defending the council. 

 Mr Williams said Camden had previously had a “good safety record” and had complied with all orders from the HSE. Mr Scorer said afterwards: “We are extremely sorry for Mr Kennedy’s tragic death. We again offer our sincere condolence to his family for their loss. 

 “The council takes the issue of health and safety extremely seriously and accepts the £40,000 fine.” He added: “Following the incident, we have worked very closely with the HSE to make the improvements recommended. In spring 2007, the council put in place a rigorous programme of electrical testing and inspection.” 

  Lawyer who won’t give up ONE of Camden’s leading lawyers has investigated the Ralph Kennedy case and believes there is still unfinished business that the council needs to address. 

 Patrick Allen, one of the founders of Hodge, Jones and Allen, now based in Euston, represents Mr Kennedy’s partner Kelly Ivory. While the council has admitted liability, the amount due in compensation is still being negotiated. 

 As revealed by the New Journal in November, those discussions took a new twist late last year when Mr Allen passed a new dossier of evidence to the council, police, a coroner and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). It contained a meticulous record compiled by a former works inspector who, while working for the council, repeatedly flagged up warnings about amateurish electrical repairs, allegedly carried out on council estates during the 1990s. 

The patch included the Mayford estate where Mr Kennedy was electrocuted. The former council employee, Edward Whelan, said his concerns were never properly addressed by his bosses, even when he warned that somebody could be killed. He also sent his file to the HSE but no action was taken. 

 Mr Allen believes all past investigations should be reopened and a second inquest should be held in the light of the emergence of the file, claiming the documents have not been properly considered and that the council’s historic lack of action exacerbated the failings in the case. At the emergence of the file, Camden said it was reviewing the documents but it has not commented on the progress of negotiations.