Borough of Camden, London, England, UK. Not endorsed or funded by Camden Council.
About this blog
NOTE: I believe this account has been illegally hacked. Little clues have been left for me. They like playing games.
Wednesday 29 June 2016
Voter Registration Fraud Risks
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/apr/16/do-i-need-my-national-insurance-number-to-register-to-vote
It is not essential to provide your national insurance (NI) number when registering to vote.
If you don’t know your NI number – which can usually be found on payslips or official letters about benefits, tax or pensions – you can just say soby giving a simple explanation.
It is then up to your local council to verify your identity.
Although online registration closes for the majority of voters on 7 June, local electoral registration offices have longer to verify your identity.
Whatever you do make sure you register to vote. You can think about who to vote for later.
“Under the new online registration system it’s just one of the ways you can have your identity verified,” says Oliver Sidorczuk, director of Bite the Ballot. “If you fill in the application, without your national insurance number, it’s your local council’s duty to verify you.”
According to the Cabinet Office, electoral registration officials will then contact you if they are unable to verify the application using other local data sources.
Such sources include cross-referencing your information with data from the Department for Work and Pensions and the Student Loans Company.
If they cannot verify you, the local electoral registration office will contact you to request further identification. (my emphasis)
This will likely be a photograph of your passport, or driving licence.
“Most progressive councils should, and I would suggest must, allow you to email in smartphone photos of your passport and driving licence,” (my emphasis) says Sidorczuk.
Less than 25% of the population know their NI number, estimates Ben Page, head of polling organisation Ipsos Mori. If you are one of them, all you have to do when filling in the online form is explain why don’t know it. You can simply write: “I don’t know where it is.”
-------------------------------
what to say?
Bite The Ballot HERE
Tuesday 21 June 2016
Public Interest Report - Derby City Council
Report of Grant Thornton UK LLP: Audit of Accounts 2013/14 and 2014/15
Governance Issues HERE
Friday 17 June 2016
Bribery at the Town Hall
'Bribe' allegation at Town Hall has been substantiated, say council investigators
Published: 16 June, 2016By RICHARD OSLEY
CAMDEN Council says a “bribery” allegation relating to the work of one of its own members of staff has been “substantiated”.
The case was revealed after a colleague reportedly blew the whistle at the Town Hall.
Information on an internal investigation was sent to councillors this week, although the full details of the case are understood to have been reserved for a small number of people at the council.
A report on fraud-busting is now due to be discussed at the Town Hall this evening (Thursday) by members of Camden’s cross-party Audit Committee. It reveals that there had been an allegation that an “employee is being bribed, ie that he has been ordering and receiving goods from a contractor in exchange for favourable treatment”.
The file goes on to simply state: “Allegation substantiated.” It says that the human resources department is “currently conducting disciplinary action”. It is understood police will not be involved. The allegation relates to a breach of staff rules rather than criminal behaviour.
Camden’s communications department said last night (Wednesday) that it could not comment on specific details of the case.
It is the most striking in a list of reports which came through to a confidential whistleblowing hotline set up for staff to privately report suspicious behaviour. Several of the allegations received through this method have not been substantiated, including a claim that a member of staff was involved in funding terrorism and that another was illegally sub-letting their own council home.
Allegations still under investigation include reports of cash theft from a library, however.
Internal fraud-busters are also reporting to the committee that over the past year Camden has found substance in 18 allegations against its staff for “fraud or malpractice”.
The outcomes of the cases included 12 dismissals, two resignations and a written warning. The numbers of staff involved are, however, a tiny minority of the council workforce as a whole.
Meanwhile, Camden is set to take further action against staff found to be misusing a loan system supposed to be in place to help them buy travel season tickets. The money cannot be used for other purposes and the council said that “it is anticipated that disciplinary action will be taken against employees who failed to comply with the scheme”.
A council spokesman said: “We conduct a series of internal audits each year to ensure our staff comply with our policies and procedures.”
-------------
Bribery Act 2010 HERE
Update 19 June 2016
The council report about the above and other such things is an officer report to the Audit and Corporate Governance committee HERE agenda item 13 - Annual Counter Fraud Report 2015 -2016 HERE
Friday 10 June 2016
London Council Overcharged Tenants for Water
The below excerpts only came to light recently via the localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk website HERE of a ruling in March 2016.
Council to refund tenants £28.6m after High Court water overcharging ruling
Thursday, 09 June 2016 07:00
The London Borough of Southwark has decided to repay 48,000 current and former tenants £28.6m following a High Court ruling earlier this year that it had overcharged for water and sewerage for 12 years.
In March this year Mr Justice Newey ruled that:
Friday 3 June 2016
Kentish Town Neighbourhood Plan Referendum 9 June 2016
I wish them good luck as they have put in a lot of effort into getting things set up etc.
I do intend to vote as its not for a candidate but an issue (can't bring myself to vote for candidates anymore) but i've not made my mind up whether to vote yes or no.
I must admit I am wary of all these platforms for people to get involved in running things, I guess due too my experience of council tenant participation with the landlord and how some groups behave and dominant things and all the shenanigans that surround it.
Personally speaking I am for less people (but the right people) being involved in running things and if I am accused of being anti-democratic by some than so be it, its my view and different views are allowed even in the 'communist republic' of Camden where capitalism thrives but say something controversial and its like its the end of the world - for some.
There are good and bad on all sides, but please no more of the 'bad' ones.
I will decide on the day.
Update 10 June 2016
Apparently most residents who voted said yes to the Plan.
Yes 1717 = 90.9 %
No 158 = 8.3%
Turnout - 13.75%.
I voted yes - thought I'd give it a go to see how the KT Forum and the Plan works in practice (not that I thought anything rested on my vote, but I figured it would be passed)
Tuesday 12 April 2016
Camden Housing Resident Scrutiny Group
Meetings
12 Nov 2013 here
11 March 2014 here presentation on the initial STAR survey results
13 May 2014 here presentation on complaints. 72% of complaints the Council received related to HASC and most of these related to repairs and improvements.
10 June 2014 here
8 July 2014 here the cost of the group was mentioned with officers saying it would be difficult to provide accurate data until the end of the 2014-15 financial year.
12 Aug 2014 here self-assessment forms circulated. members advised to complete and return by the end of the week. Sept for assessment interviews. Members to return their signed Code of Conduct forms by the end of the week. Introduction to the council complaints process
9 Sept 2014 here further information about complaints. Communications strategy.
14 Oct 2014 here extent of the groups influence
11 Nov 2014 here info on complaints. request to have further training on the councils finances
9 Dec 2014 here information from the last STAR survey. complaints info
13 Jan 2015 here election of chair and vice-chair . finance training.
10 Feb 2015 here leaseholders forum. more complaints info
10 March 2015 here
14 April 2015 here review of groups documents and ways of working. complaints report.
19 May 2015 here repairs
9 June 2015 here better homes presentation. Review of Camden Housing Resident Scrutiny Group. The issue of member’s conduct outside of group activities was felt by many members to be beyond the remit of the group and its Code of Conduct.
14 July 2015 here complaints report. references to members’ behaviour outside of the group’s activities will be removed from the group’s Code of Conduct. better homes.
11 Aug 2015 here complaints report. better homes. a member shouldn't use the name of the group when pursuing foi
8 Sept 2015 here freedom of information applications. better homes. discussions were also had around conduct in meetings.
13 Oct 2015 here Andrew Pierce (casp member) discussed with the group feedback about CHRSG from casp
10 Nov 2015 here better homes. tenant survey.
8 Dec 2015 here feedback on the Croydon Learning Exchange Event. better homes external works. tenant surveys. group review.
9 Feb 2016 here Overview of anti-social behaviour
15 March 2016 here Code of Conduct. Noise nuisance. better homes.
12 April 2016 here (march minutes not included)
Mention of members of group being unpaid volunteers.
Update 18 April 2016
In regards to the minutes: I'm sure some of this years minutes put up have been amended as I remember reading where the mention of members or a member not to tell others what to do was minuted or words to that effect and the last minutes where one of the groups members threatened staff re to make a complaint but can't find them now.
Any relation to why March's minutes haven't been put up on councils website?
I wonder who the person/s are who tell others what to and who issue threats. Thats a hard one to guess .......
Update 11 July 2016
The group are meeting tomorrow 12 July 2016 HERE but they haven't put the agenda or minutes of their 14 June 2016 meeting HERE
up on the councils website.
Update 12 August 2016
Another meeting ( 9 Aug 2016) HERE but no documents or agenda. Something amiss going on but not being made public i suspect.
Despite the CHRSG terms of reference/constitution stating the membership of the group shall consist of 15 members all of whom shall be Camden tenants or leaseholders comprising
5 representatives from the District Management Committee (1 per district)
1 representative from the Camden Leaseholders Forum
1 representative from the Camden Association of Street Properties
8 independent members
casp
has managed to get 2 casp reps on the panel. One I assume was put up
directly by casp, the other by the Gospel Oak dmc who should have put
up someone else but didn't and who shouldn't have got past the
interview panel [imo] but did.
How
do casp keep getting away with breaking the rules, general taking the
pee, throwing their weight around?
I
suspect the answer to that is with a lot of help from various council
people and other tenant reps who collude with them or who look the
other way.
Also,
it appears that in collusion with Camden council casp set up a
'gardening project' using public money from tenant rents/charges via
various dmc's - to provide free gardening maintenance to
council street property tenants. Tenants on estates have to pay for
gardening maintenance as a service charge.
Perhaps
the CHRSG would look into such issues?
Tuesday 5 April 2016
Admitting when you get something wrong
The regulations HERE didn't apply to inner London - only part of country they didn't apply to - which in itself I think is wrong but that's another matter.
Anyway, could give excuses as to my confusion over the BR's but won't.
The sun is shining today and for that I am grateful.