Back in 2009 David Padfield the councils present assistant director of housing management at a public meeting, named a council tenant as being "dealt with by the courts".
The tenant had been to court and was found guilty and fined for 'harassment' of other council tenants. Word about the summary conviction spread fast around the council. Chuckles all round?
The judge who was supposed to hear the case was swapped for another judge who had a reputation for being harsh.
Around the same time the boroughs leading council tenants group the Camden Federation of Tenants and Residents Associations (CFTRA), who have since around 2003 been funded by the council to provide tenants with a service and allegedly a 'voice', had also had experiences with the courts and been "dealt with".
Oddly this wasn't mentioned at any public meetings by the AD of housing management or any of his underlings.
It was deliberately kept quiet (covered-up). Shock horror.
Two of the cftra directors where Camden labour party members who wanted onto the council.
One had already had his chances of getting onto the council in 2006 sabotaged by antagonistic tenants who have 'form' when it comes to such things. They weren't fussy about who they targeted be they Labour, Fib-dem or Tory party members. Other residents where also targeted for the 'treatment'.
One of their tactics is to contact the police and make allegations against a particular person or person/s. This results in the target being contacted by the police either at home or by email. As with one such contact the person/s weren't even informed that an offence had been committed - but they where being watched.
Do they tell the police they work for the council?
Just how did they get Camden police to go around to an elderly disabled persons home and intimidate him into being quiet? A most shameful episode in the history of policing in Camden via the corruption that emanates from the boroughs council. People in the council including elected council members did nothing about it. One council member who really should have known better was passing information onto the 'gang'.
The gang have a tactic of befriending people who will be useful to them - the council knows about this and even encourages it.
What sort of council do we have in Camden that encourages this sort of nasty anti-social behaviour?
A public authority/municipal corporation that lacks integrity is my guessing.
The tenant had been to court and was found guilty and fined for 'harassment' of other council tenants. Word about the summary conviction spread fast around the council. Chuckles all round?
The judge who was supposed to hear the case was swapped for another judge who had a reputation for being harsh.
Around the same time the boroughs leading council tenants group the Camden Federation of Tenants and Residents Associations (CFTRA), who have since around 2003 been funded by the council to provide tenants with a service and allegedly a 'voice', had also had experiences with the courts and been "dealt with".
Oddly this wasn't mentioned at any public meetings by the AD of housing management or any of his underlings.
It was deliberately kept quiet (covered-up). Shock horror.
Two of the cftra directors where Camden labour party members who wanted onto the council.
One had already had his chances of getting onto the council in 2006 sabotaged by antagonistic tenants who have 'form' when it comes to such things. They weren't fussy about who they targeted be they Labour, Fib-dem or Tory party members. Other residents where also targeted for the 'treatment'.
One of their tactics is to contact the police and make allegations against a particular person or person/s. This results in the target being contacted by the police either at home or by email. As with one such contact the person/s weren't even informed that an offence had been committed - but they where being watched.
Do they tell the police they work for the council?
Just how did they get Camden police to go around to an elderly disabled persons home and intimidate him into being quiet? A most shameful episode in the history of policing in Camden via the corruption that emanates from the boroughs council. People in the council including elected council members did nothing about it. One council member who really should have known better was passing information onto the 'gang'.
The gang have a tactic of befriending people who will be useful to them - the council knows about this and even encourages it.
What sort of council do we have in Camden that encourages this sort of nasty anti-social behaviour?
A public authority/municipal corporation that lacks integrity is my guessing.
0 comments:
Post a Comment